In researching what the hypodermic model is, I found this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-toj0weAEM, which used advertisements as an example of how the hypodermic model can work. It made me think of how cereal advertisements have changed. In the past sugary cereals (like Lucky Charms) had commercials aimed right at children and they were shown during children's programming. Here's an example from the 90's:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foghWSflbIA. Now, people are more concerned about children's health and commercials like these are seen as irresponsible. Now, more Lucky Charms commercials are aimed at adults. To watch one example, click here. This is because many people firmly believe that if children see a commercial for a sugary cereal, they will have no choice but to beg for the cereal until their parents buy it for them. Here's an article about that: http://domain.me/kids-and-advertising.
I'm torn about how I feel about marketing sugary cereals to kids. We know that the hypodermic model has been proven incorrect, but we also know that advertising does have an affect on people, especially impressionable children. As a parent, I monitor how much screen time my boys have and I have taught them to fast-forward through commercials whenever possible.
What do you think about the relationship between advertisements and the hypodermic model?
Monday, March 21, 2016
Monday, February 29, 2016
Stereotypes and Pitch Perfect 2
I watched Pitch Perfect 2 just a couple of days
after watching The Celluloid Closet, and the week after our discussions and
readings about representations of race in the media. Pitch Perfect is a comedy about a group of girls who are an a capella singing
group. One of the reasons that it is funny is that it over-plays stereotypes of
all kinds to poke fun at them. Rebel Wilson plays a character who calls herself
"Fat Amy" and her size is a big part of her quirky personality. Hana
Mae Lee plays an Asian girl who speaks so quietly you can never hear what she's
saying. Chrissie Fit plays a girl from Guatemala who is always concerned about
being deported. Ester Dean plays an African American lesbian girl who is
very butch and claims to be the biggest minority out there because she’s black,
a woman, and gay.
After watching The Celluloid Closet and thinking
about our discussions about race and the way people are represented in the
media, this movie got me thinking about how homosexual people or people of
color might feel about this movie. One of the things The Celluloid Closet
pointed out was that not every gay person feels the same way about movies. For
example, one man hated the “sissy” characterization and another liked it. This article from the Canadian Centre for Digital and Media Literacy points out the
same thing and says that it should be considered whether the makers of the media product are
gay and whether the gay community at large has accepted the product.
I would guess that some people of color and some
gay people would laugh at this movie and see that it is pointing out the
absurdity of stereotypes, while others may feel that it’s perpetuating those
stereotypes. What do you think?
Sunday, February 21, 2016
Race portrayals in Me and Earl and the Dying Girl
I just finished reading the YA novel Me and Earl and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews. The plot is
basically Greg and Earl befriend Rachel (a girl who has cancer) and make a film
for her. The movie based on this book was released last summer. I read it this
week, and I was surprised by how much it made
the black characters stereotypes. The first thing that struck me was when introducing the “jocks” Greg, the main
character, says “they’re pretty much all black, and many of the white kids are
afraid of them.” It only gets worse from there.
When Greg introduces his friend Earl, the fact that he is black
is one of the first things he tells the reader. Pretty much the only things Earl says are
profane and/or violent. Earl’s family is even worse. There are no men in Earl’s
house. Earl’s dad is “in Texas or something” and his half brothers’ dad is in
prison. Greg’s dad, however, is a college professor who is an active part of
Greg’s life. When Greg goes to visit Earl’s house, Earl’s brother breaks Greg’s
arm over a small disagreement because Earl’s family is just that violent. Greg
has trouble in school, and a teacher arranges with his parents for Greg to stay
after school every day for tutoring. Greg says Earl is in classes where “you
could staple a dead animal to your homework and still pass”. Earl’s aspirations
for life are to be a manager at Wendy’s. Greg isn’t sure what he wants to do,
but the book ends with his hopes of going to film school and it’s clear that he
has a lot of options.
This is really troubling, especially because the film
adaptation was widely acclaimed and received awards at the Sundance Film
Festival. Not surprisingly, I’m not the only one to write about Earl’s
portrayal. If you’re interested check out these links:
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/whats-missing-from-me-and-earl-and-the-dying-girl
Friday, February 12, 2016
Ideology in Novels
One of the genres of novels I talked about last week was
Christian Romance Novels. These books unabashedly push an ideology. They are
written by Christians, about Christians, for Christians. I’m a Christian, and
sometimes I like to read these. For a while, this was my favorite genre. I like
reading about people who share my faith, and I like a happy-ever-after story.
However as I matured, I realized many of these books promote
ideas I don’t agree with and find to be troubling. For example, many have a perfect ending. This blogger discusses that problem in Karen Kingsbury
books (she’s one of the most popular authors of the genre). It is nice to read
a story where everything works out for the protagonist, but if these authors
are truly trying to present how someone can live out a faith in Christ, they
are doing their readers a disservice by neatly tying up all the endings. Just
because you are a Christian doesn’t mean everything will work out for you, and
I’m concerned that these books could make immature Christians feel as though if
only they were better Christians, things would work out for them like they do
for characters in the novels they read.
Another problem I have with books in this genre is the idea that
every woman needs a man to protect her and be her happy ever after. This isn’t
unique to Christian Romance novels, of course, but it is heavily portrayed in
many of these books. The book known for beginning the genre is Love Comes Softly by Jeanette Oke. In this book set in the 1800’s, the protagonist’s husband
dies on their trip out West and she must marry a stranger in order to survive. The
book details how their marriage of convenience becomes a marriage of love. This
is a sweet story, but it’s been repeated ad nauseam by other authors who only
change the details. I would love to read more novels with strong Christian female
protagonists. Anybody know of one I haven’t read? Let me know!
I still occasionally read a Christian Romance novel, but now I like to read novels from lots of different
perspectives. Novels are one of the few ways we have to climb into someone else’s
thoughts and see the world the way they do. I try to choose books from a wide
variety of ideologies. Some I agree with, some I disagree with, but I always
learn something from seeing the world from someone else’s eyes.
Do you gravitate towards media that promotes ideologies you
agree with?
Monday, February 8, 2016
Oh So Conventional
As I may have mentioned before, I'm an avid reader. I
like to read all kinds of things from almost every section of the library.
There are
two types of novels, as explained in this article:genre fiction and literary fiction.
Some people read only one genre of fiction. At my library,
we even have stickers to go on the spines of books so that patrons can easily
know what genre the book belongs to. We have Sci Fi stickers, Mystery stickers,
Romance stickers, and stickers with crosses on them to identify Christian
Fiction.
I like to
read both genre fiction and literary fiction. Sometimes, I'll pick a book out
of a certain genre just because I want to know what to expect. Like the article
says, it’s an escape from reality. For example, sometimes I'll be in the mood
for a mystery novel because I want to get wrapped up in a mystery to solve
and have everything explained and settled by the end. Sometimes I read a sappy
Christian Romance novel because I know it will end happily ever after. Usually
I go for these kinds of books when I’m stressed about school or other stuff
going on because I like knowing what to expect in the book.
When I’m
not using up all my available brain cells on school, I like to read literary
fiction. In these books, I don’t know what to expect, and they often teach me
something or help me see someone else’s point of view.
Most bestsellers are genre fiction. Often times, people like to know what to
expect from their entertainment.
What about you? Do you gravitate
towards a certain genre of books, movies, or music because it’s familiar?
Monday, February 1, 2016
Bernie Sanders and His Views on Media Conglomeration
This election season has brought some surprising characters to the forefront. The American people are tired of the usual politicians and some unexpected candidates are being taken seriously. For example, Donald Trump on the Republican side and Bernie Sanders on the Democratic side.
Sanders has spoken out against the conglomeration of media companies. As we learned in class, 6 corporations control 90% of the media in America: http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6
Here is a link to a discussion Sanders had with Bill Moyers: Bernie and Bill Moyers. I believe this was filmed in 2012, but he has posted it on his campaign page feelthebern.org because he and his followers still find it relevant. In this discussion, he makes some good arguments about the fact that very few Americans think its a good idea for just a few companies to own all of the news outlets, whether they be TV, newspaper, or radio. He says "it will be bad for minorities, it will be bad for women, and most of all, it will be bad for democracy."
One thing I learned from this video that really surprised me was the fact that sometimes several news stations share offices, people, and sometimes even the same scripts. It is scary how few people are in charge of the news the American people hear. Sanders argues that major issues get very little discussion, and the FCC has got to create a situation in which the American people are hearing a diverse range of ideas so that our public world has the kind of debate that our public needs.
I don't agree with Bernie Sanders on everything, but I agree with him that we should be concerned about the conglomeration of media. What do you think?
Book Rating System????
I
love to read. I read all types of books-- I still love to read kids’ books and
I love to read novels from lots of different genres. This week in
class, we’ve been talking about the effect of politics on media. We discussed rating
systems for music and movies and it made me wonder why there is no such rating
system for books. I found a couple of book rating systems online here: http://ratedreads.com/book-review-ratings-guid/
and here: http://www.compassbookratings.com/
. Obviously, some people are concerned about the content in books, but there
has not been a nationwide ratings system adopted or enforced.
If
there were a ratings system, would there be an age requirement to purchase
explicitly sexual or explicitly violent books? As a parent of a 10 year old who
loves to read, I monitor the content of what he is reading. As he gets older, I
want to stay involved in his reading choices, but I think I might be more
likely to allow him to read a book with more mature content than I would allow
him to watch in a movie. For example, I am considering allowing him to read the
Hunger Games novels, but I don’t think he’s ready for the violence of the
movies yet.
Even
though I monitor the content of what my children are reading, I’m glad there is
not a government ratings system for books. Most of the books I read come from
the public library- either through their e-book collection or physical books on
the shelf. At the public library where I work, the manager is in charge of
collection development. She decides which books are appropriate for our shelves,
mainly based on popularity. The library is funded by local, state, and federal
monies, but they do not censor what kinds of books each library can have. If
there was a ratings system, books could be “rated” out of the library.
What
do you think about the idea of a book rating system?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)